Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 20:49
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 47.9
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 128
47% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 202
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Palit(1569 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 23.6
19% 22.6 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 19
19% 24.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 60GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 54 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 156
Write 56.7
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 55.6
20% 89 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 23.3
86% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 79.1
DQ Write 59.1
DQ Mixed 70.3
52% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Kingston KM0VW4-MID 16GB
1200, 1200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 14.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback