HP Z200 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z200 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B48h
Memory3.4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110309
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '22 at 00:26
Run Duration347 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 145
67% 108 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 378
43% 334 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 4
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 125 43 65 40 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 203
Write 153
Mixed 190
SusWrite 60.9
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 22.8
77% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 144
115% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
85GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 132 131 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 131
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673GB0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback