Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 77321FG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 77321FG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 77321FG
Memory0.6 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '22 at 07:46
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7100-$99
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 22
2-Core 35
30% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 41.9
8-Core 41.2
6% 41.6 Pts
64-Core 45.8
3% 45.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 20B5)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1867
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.4 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.8
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 510 Series 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 65 57 47 100 104 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.8% Poor
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 111
SusWrite 69.4
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 13.5
44% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 84.6
DQ Write 61.7
DQ Mixed 65.7
51% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 77321FG Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 77321FG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback