Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 18:49
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 154
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 350
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 38.4
32% 40 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 33.2
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 211 39 5.5 55 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.3% Poor
Read 256
Write 228
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 78.7
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 8.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
759GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 76.9
Write 75.1
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 93.2
104% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.7
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback