Oegstone P9X79 LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemOegstone P9X79 LE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P9X79 LE
Memory45.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 22:07
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 196
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 618
61% 497 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 175 197 198 199 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 182
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 189
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-031.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 99U5402-031.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 99U5402-031.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 99U5402-031.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 48GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 36
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 LE Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone P9X79 LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback