Lenovo 4155CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4155CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 05:45
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5680
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 175
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 510
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800
Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 12
Parallax 4.4
7% 8.5 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 3.6
5% 6.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 123 134 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.6% Below average
Read 225
Write 132
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 131
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 1
40% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 92.2
DQ Write 36.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
17% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
465GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 130 132 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 123
Write 123
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 131
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
161% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 1089 9965472-006.A00LF 00DA HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 00DA HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4155CTO Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4155CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback