Today's hottest deals

HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D6
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 08:17
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 262
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 870
89% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 38.4
30% 39 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA1T0QFD-1AX1AABHA 1TB
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 1023 1059 1108 1055 1061 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,206
Write 1,117
Mixed 976
SusWrite 1,048
245% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 42.7
144% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 314
395% 701 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 196%
Great: 286%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 26.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 29.6
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback