Today's hottest deals

Foxconn A88GA-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardFoxconn A88GA-S  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100811
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 12:17
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 938, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 94.9
46% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 190
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
Sapphire(174B E144) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 9.9
9% 10.7 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.8
7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 63 61 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 183
Write 60.3
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 60.3
22% 98 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 14.3
49% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 17.4
13% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
64GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 76
Write 80
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 84.4
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88GA-S Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A88GA-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback