Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 147 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 368 39% 312 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 179B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.4 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 07TA SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 122 153 150 155 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 294 Write 217 Mixed 215 SusWrite 147 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 12.2 59% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 93.1 DQ Mixed 9.3 21% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	47.5% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.1 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1,222x
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples	173x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	30x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	36x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	32x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	28x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $227