HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F9
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 07:46
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
76% 144 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 607
65% 518 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 88F9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9510
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 30
Parallax 9.2
7% 15.8 fps
Splatting 7.4
8% 7.4 fps
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane H10 with SSD 512GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 241 137 73 73 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 91%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30
Write 6
Mixed 4
12% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
76GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 27.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 36.8
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 23.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 14.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx Builds (Compare 4,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback