Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 78.5 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 184 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 161 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 32 18 13 16 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 383 Write 278 Mixed 162 SusWrite 26.1 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 5.6 66% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 23.8 46% 90 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 94%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 1,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 13GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 29 Mixed 1.7 11% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HTH5AN8G6NCJR-VKD 1x4GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.4% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 6 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.2 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	50x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	9x
UDIMM DDR4 2400 C17 1x4GBCrucial $15Bench 39%, 4,926 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16