HP ProLiant ML150 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant ML150 Gen9  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant ML150 Gen9
Memory245.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160912
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User MAC-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 60
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 74.6
37% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 279
29% 235 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 800GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 383 370 357 359 373 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
Read 316
Write 360
Mixed 292
SusWrite 369
76% 334 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 25.6
89% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 233
176% 239 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 75%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 6.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 8.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 226 131 177 194 247 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 31.5TB
17.5TB free
Firmware: 8.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 122 392 594 584 583 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 809083-091 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 40.4
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML150 Gen9 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP ProLiant ML150 Gen9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback