Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 16:56
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$450
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 143
2-Core 280
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 916
87% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 441D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 267
Parallax 548
208% 357 fps
MRender 411
Gravity 220
Splatting 345
267% 325 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 203%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 639 507 493 479 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,264
Write 3,613
Mixed 2,134
SusWrite 610
486% 2,155 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 85.9
284% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1374
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 1114
858% 1,176 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 270%
Great: 496%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
973GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 111 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 188
Write 164
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 110
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 1.1
15% 5.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 1.3
3% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 38%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
518GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 462 462 462 462 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 456
Mixed 456
SusWrite 461
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58
192% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ01ABB200 2TB
451GB free
Firmware: AY000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 88 87 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48% Average
Read 81.2
Write 69.1
Mixed 31
SusWrite 85.8
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48%
Great: 61%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
620GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 81 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 71.9
Write 72.2
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 79.8
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 55%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
36GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 46 46 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 44.8
29% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 37.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,451
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback