HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro 3130 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 22:52
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 66.4
38% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 137
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 2A9C) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.5
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 201 175 160 163 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 222
Write 196
Mixed 180
SusWrite 167
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 15.2
64% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 39.8
DQ Mixed 1.2
26% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
466GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 128 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 128
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
FE02FE02 EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 9801 9905474-029.A00LF CE80CE80 M378B5773CH0-CK0 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3130 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback