Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 14:56
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 181
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 524
47% 397 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 11
Parallax 19.9
10% 14.5 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 12.6
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P300 256GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,051
Write 314
Mixed 110
105% 492 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 6.7
72% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 152
123% 183 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 185%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
674GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 169 176 175 176 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 149
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 172
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2324WC.002 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback