Positivo VJFE51F11X-B0111H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo VJFE51F11X-B0111H  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-KL
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 15:22
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 260
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Ic10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 366 235 1.6 45 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 182
Write 107
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 169
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 8.2
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 191
108% 103 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 128 132 127 121 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 123
Write 108
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 125
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
221% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WB-BCRC 08B6 MS401GNSE-CB4M2 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJFE51F11X-B0111H Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE51F11X-B0111H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $89Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $373
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback