HP ProBook 450 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 450 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 837D
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180130
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 13:13
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Memory 1.19
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 72.2
17% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 176
19% 152 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 837D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 3.7
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 241 247 244 250 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 314
Write 239
Mixed 229
SusWrite 248
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 12.9
44% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 146
110% 148 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 141%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
754GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 106 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 76.5
Write 97
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 105
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
153% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 494
8% 494 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 450 G5 Builds (Compare 1,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback