Today's hottest deals

Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Rampage II Extreme  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 20:39
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 97.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 651
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 799
50% 799 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 74
43% 62.2 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 44.2
44% 55.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 242 243 244 245 245 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
74.9% Very good
Read 254
Write 243
Mixed 236
SusWrite 243
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 39.7
132% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 131%
Patriot Burst 480GB
31GB free
Firmware: SBFM21.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 118 152 90 110 10 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.1% Above average
Read 248
Write 97.2
Mixed 214
SusWrite 96.9
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 24.1
93% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 145
123% 179 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 100%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 5.9 6.8 6.3 6.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 12.4
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 7
19% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
47% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 51%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$20
21GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 27.8
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 28.7
39% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
76% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 21.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 16.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback