Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DA7/E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DA7/E  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DA7/E
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '22 at 18:12
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 139
56% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 503
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 1,096
68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 369
Write 199
Mixed 235
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 26.5
94% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 145
130% 196 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 91%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
416GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 138 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 132
Mixed 109
SusWrite 135
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 101%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
13GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8 8.8 10 10 8.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 8.9
8% 6.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-165.A 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 31
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.3
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DA7/E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DA7/E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback