Alienware Area-51 R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware Area-51 R5  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0N4R4N
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '22 at 22:59
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980XE-$1,097
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 249
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 973
84% 718 Pts
64-Core 2,309
143% 2,309 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
HP(103C 90FA) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13026.3
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 21.3
13% 21.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 20
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpe21d960gad NVME INTEL 960GB
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E201D03N Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1684 1722 1675 1600 1603 1603 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 1,920
Write 1,669
Mixed 1,783
SusWrite 1,648
395% 1,755 MB/s
4K Read 122
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 113
386% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 496
375% 505 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 320%
Great: 400%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
162GB free
Firmware: E2010480 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1497 1499 1509 1527 1498 1521 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 1,989
Write 1,640
Mixed 1,791
SusWrite 1,508
390% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 157
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 136
482% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 553
415% 556 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 345%
Great: 559%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
319GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 369 368 365 364 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 451
Mixed 434
SusWrite 366
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 44.5
148% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-000H7 256GB
117GB free
Firmware: MVT23H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 279 261 310 301 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 450
Mixed 402
SusWrite 306
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 44.1
146% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
800GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 75 80 82 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 39.1
Write 62
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 75.3
43% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
149% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston XN205T-MIE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.1% Good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 19.1
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 9.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area-51 R5 Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Alienware Area-51 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $734
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback