Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 164 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 301 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 1.1 3% 3.37 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 4 Splatting 2.5 3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 3%
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz) 8,807 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 0112) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.6 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 378 338 296 291 318 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 352 Write 433 Mixed 305 SusWrite 331 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 40.3 126% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 321 252% 347 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 271GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 135 133 134 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 128 Write 113 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 133 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 112%
WD WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 150GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 95GB free Firmware: 20.07P20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 73 73 74 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 67.7 Write 81.8 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 72.9 49% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.5% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 12.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	311x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	269x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	238x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $577

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16