Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1970
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 11:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 138
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 208
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 1970) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3304
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 380 214 181 115 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 420
Write 374
Mixed 353
SusWrite 237
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 9.5
57% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 1.2
65% 151 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
403GB free
Firmware: AM002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 72.5
Write 70.9
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 83.2
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback