Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate P245-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate P245-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA40_HW
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 17:31
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 94.9
51% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 144
20% 145 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0822) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 5.7
2% 3.53 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 371 390 384 397 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 468
Write 390
Mixed 366
SusWrite 383
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 27.1
110% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 44.6
86% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P245-M Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P245-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback