Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 22:04
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE w/ Radeon Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 47.7
30% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 70
14% 93.4 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 38.7
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 27.9
28% 35 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 480GB SSD 480GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07656
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 13 14 14 6.7 9.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 110%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
31GB free
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 8.1 8.9 5.9 7.2 6.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 10.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback