MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 02:29
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 24.4
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 119
30% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 208
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 8
Parallax 7.7
0% 5.3 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.7
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T2535T240G 240GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1011A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 191 74 120 63 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 355
Write 292
Mixed 273
SusWrite 80.9
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 5.8
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 0.7
29% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
136GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 92 91 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 83
Write 93.5
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 89.5
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 88%
ST500LT0 12-9WS142 500GB
57GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 30 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 28.3
Mixed 22
SusWrite 32.3
39% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2666C16/16G 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 290
14% 290 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback