Today's hottest deals

HP Mini 311-1000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Mini 311-1000  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 3651
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090804
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 11:28
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Memory 41.5
1-Core 2.1
2-Core 4.7
15% 16.1 Pts
4-Core 4.6
8-Core 4.7
1% 4.65 Pts
64-Core 4.9
0% 4.9 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia ION
HP(103C 3651) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 331.82
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032V 320GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 53 60 57 59 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 7.8
Write 52.3
Mixed 17
SusWrite 59.9
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873EH1-C7 Micron 8JSF12864HZ-1G1F1 2GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.99% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2
6% 2.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 0.9 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mini 311-1000 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Mini 311-1000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback