Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Memory 35.9 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 120 45% 80.9 Pts	4-Core 51 8-Core 101 9% 76.1 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8423) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 26.5 Parallax 26.2 17% 24.6 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 23.7 17% 20.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: ST2OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 47 56 61 60 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 24.7 Write 49 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 58.6 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB 2,814 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 5.1 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 222 18% 222 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	129x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	33x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x
99U5471-002.A01LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 45%, 627 samples	13x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	13x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $202