Centerm F620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCenterm F620  (all builds)
MotherboardCenterm F620
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211011
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 20:47
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 118
43% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 232
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 313 340 341 346 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 352
Write 295
Mixed 265
SusWrite 340
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 17.4
102% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 33
74% 152 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FD4AS3200C8GTG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F620 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Centerm F620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback