Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 00:55
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7640X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 506
70% 516 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.8% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
111% 127 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 102
Splatting 0.3
58% 81.8 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 64 89 73 0.7 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.9% Above average
Read 176
Write 103
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 69.4
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 28.7
102% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 174
165% 255 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
405GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 147 147 150 151 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 104
SusWrite 143
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
42GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9.3 9.3 5.7 7 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 9
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 7.3
13% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.2
103% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CB DDR4 3000 2OZ 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CB DDR4 3000 2OZ 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 33.7
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 30.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback