Lenovo 30E1S0T400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30E1S0T400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1046
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 02:10
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 282
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,109
98% 834 Pts
64-Core 2,921
181% 2,921 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 21.5
13% 21.5 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 16
Splatting 20
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1363 971 967 967 968 969 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,010
Write 2,325
Mixed 1,789
SusWrite 1,034
403% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 78.7
277% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 1104
830% 1,115 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 279%
Great: 278%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
952GB free
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2129 1722 1723 1725 1730 1735 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2013
Write 2,235
Mixed 1,904
SusWrite 1,794
448% 1,986 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 79.8
279% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 1,165
864% 1,148 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 327%
Great: 332%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 32GB-$7
28GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 10 13 11 13 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 86.9
Write 19.5
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 11
32% 33 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 67.8
MC Write 48.1
MC Mixed 69.8
177% 61.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 38.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 156%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback