Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 260%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory43.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime25.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 02:32
Run Duration450 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$277
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 209
2-Core 421
126% 240 Pts
4-Core 818
8-Core 1,593
143% 1,206 Pts
64-Core 2,846
176% 2,846 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
EVGA(3842 3982) ≥ 4GB; 24G-P5-3987-KR
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
219% Outstanding
Lighting 330
Reflection 294
Parallax 341
269% 322 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 257
Splatting 184
209% 267 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 219%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 263 323 260 174 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,069
Write 1,030
Mixed 660
SusWrite 281
222% 1,010 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 52.9
251% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 710
626% 932 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 221%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
679GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 488 479 482 487 488 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 455
Mixed 416
SusWrite 485
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 47.9
176% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 256
192% 257 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
424GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1794 1797 1799 1799 1803 1604 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,366
Write 1795
Mixed 904
SusWrite 1766
381% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 79
284% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,315
DQ Write 1,345
DQ Mixed 1,138
908% 1,266 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 349%
Great: 353%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$239
1TB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2433 2154 1184 1195 1208 1212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 2275
Mixed 1,673
SusWrite 1,564
449% 2,005 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 89.5
306% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,996
DQ Write 1,616
DQ Mixed 1,754
1,327% 1,789 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 371%
Great: 371%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
447GB free
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4316 2773 1146 992 1030 957 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
473% Outstanding
Read 3,979
Write 4,113
Mixed 3,087
SusWrite 1869
732% 3,262 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 96.8
363% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 2,208
DQ Write 1,787
DQ Mixed 1,969
1,482% 1,988 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 473%
Great: 578%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-16GTZ 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 32.7
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 28.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 16,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback