Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100531
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 17:20
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$85
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 85.4
38% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 164
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
PwrHis(1787 2293) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 5
4% 5.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 67 70 65 73 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.6% Average
Read 222
Write 215
Mixed 189
SusWrite 70.1
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 28.2
101% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 37.5
32% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$60
191GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 77 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43% Average
Read 74.4
Write 76.9
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 75.5
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback