HP p7-1439

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p7-1439  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 02:08
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 119
46% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 180
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0221A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 219 130 141 122 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 434
Write 361
Mixed 368
SusWrite 174
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 27.8
130% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 50.3
84% 161 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.M8FM Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 CT25664BA1339.C8FE 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1439 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback