Today's hottest deals

Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRL-F
Memory248.9 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 10:28
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
CPU1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 199
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 712
64% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,667
103% 1,667 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Elitegroup(1019 0036) 2GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 32.3
20% 28.3 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 20
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 338 295 314 311 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 1,278
Write 451
Mixed 316
SusWrite 316
129% 591 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 21.6
84% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 176
140% 191 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 316%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 7.5TB
7TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 194 195 188 205 189 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 162
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 193
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 105%
Great: 180%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 78.4
Write 28.3
Mixed 49
SusWrite 14.6
50% 42.6 MB/s
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
36% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 72ASS4G72LZ-2G1A1 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 41.1
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 20.3
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 119%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback