Today's hottest deals

CMS 7211-5731A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
SystemCMS 7211-5731A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H510M-A
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 00:06
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$68
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 237
73% 138 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 596
63% 505 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 48.6
46% 54.5 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 46.4
38% 45.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 56 12 31 63 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 407
Write 229
Mixed 172
SusWrite 64.8
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 16.2
63% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 41.7
45% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
19GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 111 110 107 105 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65% Good
Read 120
Write 129
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 107
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7211-5731A Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: CMS 7211-5731A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback