Today's hottest deals

Jp.ik E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemJp.ik E1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PB560-D4
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 11:16
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 248
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 696
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 8.2
7% 7.97 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSN095SA328-Y01Q1I0 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 394 343 129 93 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 461
Write 445
Mixed 378
SusWrite 236
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 38
137% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 217
161% 211 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Intaiell 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E1 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Jp.ik E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback