Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 20:13
Run Duration461 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$164
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 174
2-Core 346
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1,296
116% 981 Pts
64-Core 1,633
101% 1,633 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 154
Parallax 162
127% 157 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 137
Splatting 122
122% 154 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1403 1084 1122 1076 1026 978 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 2,416
Mixed 1,736
SusWrite 1,115
436% 1,946 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 91.3
307% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1474
DQ Write 1,180
DQ Mixed 1,295
978% 1,316 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 323%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
29GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 238 114 111 107 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 453
Mixed 394
SusWrite 190
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 57.6
189% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 197
149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 134%
WDC WD140EMFZ-11A0WA0 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 117 116 118 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 113
Write 141
Mixed 109
SusWrite 115
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 1.2
14% 5.17 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 2.4
3% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 26%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
239GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 106 105 104 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 41.6
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 34.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 43.7
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $914
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback