Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$70
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 183
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 262
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.97 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 571 68 69 40 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 573
Mixed 296
SusWrite 225
128% 585 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 48.6
174% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 299
249% 348 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 134%
Great: 197%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$23
49GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 110
Write 120
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 103
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 8GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 30.3
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback