Alaska EC90A-GH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAlaska EC90A-GH  (all builds)
MotherboardDFI GHF51
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 08:10
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 103
41% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 177
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 6
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.4
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 4 3 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 15.5
Write 1
Mixed 2
SusWrite 3.4
5% 5.47 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.6
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback