Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 970 Quad Core 50 User benchmarks, average bench 43% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	42% Average	Memory 45.6 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 137 48% 86.1 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 224 30% 222 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Palit(1569 0FC6) 2GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.28% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 12.9 8% 11.3 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 64GB 1,117 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 145 144 145 142 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 401 Write 150 Mixed 174 SusWrite 142 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 27.2 97% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 112 112% 183 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 81%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 538GB free Firmware: 2AJ10003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 89 89 89 83 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50% Average	Read 88.2 Write 39.2 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 85.8 48% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R744G2606U1S 2x4GB 328 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.4% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 12.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 9.6 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	61x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	48x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233