Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 393 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 149 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 510 51% 415 Pts	64-Core 676 42% 676 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% XFX(1682 7251) 2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	6.57% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 13.8 7% 11 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 9.5 Splatting 8.1 6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.57% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB 2,108 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 83 45 47 81 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 469 Write 386 Mixed 349 SusWrite 77.4 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 11.6 82% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 16.1 53% 114 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SRE4U3200E16082C 2x8GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66.8% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 19.7 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 26.2 SC Mixed 16.8 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	62x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	39x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $259

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16