TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8592
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 20:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 837
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 86.2%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8592) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 9.2
5% 8.4 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 13.8
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 6.25%
 Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg5aznv512g KIOXIA 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 500 499 499 498 498 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,167
Write 1,060
Mixed 944
SusWrite 599
211% 943 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 55.6
183% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 752
572% 769 MB/s
Poor: 87% ↑
This bench: 175%
 Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 27.8
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 27.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 88.2%
 Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

CPU
Core i5-9500IntelBench 87%, 9,059 samples154x
Core i7-9700Intel  $243Bench 92%, 79,875 samples139x
Core i5-8500Intel  $166Bench 82%, 43,089 samples31x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples168x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples106x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples28x
SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples19x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples17x
hynix PC601 HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GBSKBench 136%, 523 samples15x
RAM
M378A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 48%, 1,820 samples31x
HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 48%, 870 samples17x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD Kingston HP26D4U9S8MD-8 16GBSamsungBench 77%, 46 samples14x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback