Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 08:59
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 255
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 678
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
ASRock(1849 5115) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 96.3
56% 76.3 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 41.9
46% 58 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 68 3.6 4 3.9 5.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 504
Write 251
Mixed 323
SusWrite 56.5
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 26.3
130% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 37.7
71% 138 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 92%
Inateck ASM1153E 128GB
9GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 388
Write 222
Mixed 184
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 21.6
78% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 51
58% 100 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 67%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
152GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 81 83 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 48.8
Write 82.7
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 81.7
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.4
157% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 71%
Mass Storage Device 128GB
77GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 19.9
Write 19.2
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 19.5
26% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 4.5
297% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 26
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 26.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback