Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 12:23
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 574
57% 467 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 38.5
30% 39 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 27.4
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 308 49 54 52 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 467
Write 438
Mixed 397
SusWrite 135
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 21.4
102% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 34
88% 179 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.6% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback