HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory112.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 21:33
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 791
68% 584 Pts
64-Core 3080
191% 3080 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 194
Parallax 186
146% 187 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 183
Splatting 125
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1102 1387 1356 466 988 864 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2,057
Write 1,374
Mixed 941
SusWrite 1,027
300% 1,350 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 35.5
140% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 142
143% 247 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 201%
Great: 477%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
63GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,336
Write 2,204
Mixed 1434
443% 1,991 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 60.7
199% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 536
390% 514 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 256GB
59GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 161 167 131 142 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 205
Write 363
Mixed 232
SusWrite 148
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 21
68% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 133
90% 113 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 109%
Generic S400 HAR 4TB
586GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 0 0 31 6.7 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
979GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 119 133 117 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 103
Write 94.4
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 120
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
659GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 129 144 126 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 175
Write 158
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 129
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDT72107 750GB
564GB free
Firmware: A31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 109 95 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 98.6
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 62%
WD Game Drive 12TB
2.5TB free, PID 263a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 147 136 124 128 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 143
Write 158
Mixed 121
SusWrite 133
189% 139 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.8
251% 4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 M393A2K40BB1-CRC 127GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 32767, 16384, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 25.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback