Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire VN7-791G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire VN7-791G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire VN7-791G
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 10:29
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 93
2-Core 159
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 246
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 091D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 6.4
3% 11.4 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G871201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 136 127 132 131 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 413
Write 170
Mixed 212
SusWrite 132
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 32.2
107% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 169
145% 216 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 87%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: HKF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 60 76 34 91 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 26.7
Write 26.2
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 56.5
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.9
250% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire VN7-791G Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire VN7-791G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback