Asus Q304UAK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus Q304UAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q304UAK
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160720
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 14:22
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 89
2-Core 173
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 188
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1480) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.53 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
831GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 75 79 78 76 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 387
Write 371
Mixed 359
SusWrite 111
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 41.1
130% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 326
249% 337 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 121%
ASMT 2115 750GB
307GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 71 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 60.5
Write 71.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 71.4
80% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 01BA 8GBU1X08JGGG39-12-K 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 7.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q304UAK Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q304UAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback