MSI E3M WORKSTATION V5 (MS-7A44)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A44
MotherboardMSI E3M WORKSTATION V5 (MS-7A44)  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '17 at 13:22
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 94
2-Core 177
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 484
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.51% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 7.22
10% 9.58 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 14.4
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.51%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 504
Write 94.3
Mixed 158
54% 252 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 25
110% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 47.8
67% 127 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 163
Write 148
Mixed 146
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.25
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.35
142% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3M WORKSTATION V5 (MS-7A44) Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI E3M WORKSTATION V5 (MS-7A44)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback