Today's hottest deals

HP 2000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 2000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3577
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111218
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 15:51
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 50.1
1-Core 18
2-Core 33.1
24% 33.7 Pts
4-Core 35.3
8-Core 33
5% 34.2 Pts
64-Core 32.8
2% 32.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5076GSX 500GB-$54
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 62 71 49 65 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 69.3
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 58.4
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 4.1
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 2000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback