Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z97X-UD3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 09:43
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 229
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 647
63% 515 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 68.3
54% 70.2 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 68
Splatting 59.2
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 378 403 419 429 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 470
Mixed 360
SusWrite 383
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 45
158% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 348
266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Synology HAT5300-8T 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 213 218 216 217 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 221
Write 205
Mixed 107
SusWrite 209
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.63 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 7.6
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 25%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 114 114 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 81.1
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 113
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 87%
Synology HAT5300-8T 8TB
106GB free
Firmware: 1401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 177 178 182 169 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 159
Mixed 103
SusWrite 175
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
216% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 132%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 116 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 120
Write 111
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 115
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
34GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.2
Write 86
Mixed 34.9
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback